by Ted Lang
In London last week, a mini 9-11, engineered and perpetrated in all likelihood once again by that same, most efficient, secret, false flag operation in the world, the Mossad, seems to have fulfilled my prophecy. Remember the motto of the Mossad: "By way of deception, thou shalt do war." The smoke hadn't even cleared, and the sounds of the exploding bombs had barely ceased reverberating, and right there, in the middle of this most recent carnage, was Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu!
How did they even get into this picture in the first place? How is it that of all the nations in the entire world, tiny Israel is being included in journalistic assessments of early warnings about terrorist bombings involving Scotland Yard? Did Israel warn Scotland Yard? Did Scotland Yard warn Israel? Since we will never really learn the truth, who cares?! This issue is moot - Israel WAS there!
According to the July 11th Bellaciao website article, "Unanswered questions in London bombings," the "confusion" surrounding who said what to whom and when takes on an almost comical dimension against the backdrop of the tragedy and usual innocent lives lost. It offers, "A third controversial issue is the early report that the Israeli Embassy in London had been informed of a possible bombing prior to the first explosion."
The article continues: "A report published by the Associated Press (AP) at 12:16 p.m. on July 7, authored by Amy Teibel in Jerusalem, stated, 'British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.' The article continued: 'Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had planned to attend an economic conference in a hotel over the subway stop where one of the blasts occurred, and the warning prompted him to stay in his hotel room instead, government officials said....
Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to the economic conference. 'The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the nature of his position.'
Within hours, the original Associated Press report had been removed, following denials by Israeli officials in Tel Aviv and London. But the report had already been taken up by numerous publications internationally. AP replaced its original article with another, headlined, 'Israel 'Not Warned' about London Attacks.'"
Sorry, too late! I believe that Israel not only knew of the attacks, but very actively participated in them just as they had done on 9-11!
After all of the confusion as to who was warned when, now both Netanyahu and the Israelis deny everything, just as in the case with the Larry Franklin and the AIPAC spy scandal. Conflicting testimony from those directly involved is always advantageous in proceedings and investigations where the sole object is to get at the truth. And as always, there in the shadows, behind virtually every act of terrorism in the world, are the Israelis and their leader, Ariel Sharon.
According to Reuters in their July 8th report, "Ariel Sharon muzzles ministers on London blasts," the reason offered for the Israeli gag order was to blunt anti-Israeli sentiment by not capitalizing on the anger of British citizens in pointing out any similarity between Israel's "struggle" with Islam and now that of Great Britain's. Pure poppycock!
Clearly, the intent is to avoid the very conflicting accounts that could cause a verbal misstep on the order of a Downing Street Memo-style exposé! But this is what Netanyahu was quoted as saying in the Reuters' article by Matt Spetalnick: "Despite Sharon's directive, Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, visiting London at the time of the blasts, wrote in the daily Maariv: 'Now the British have unwillingly joined not only us, the Israelis, in absorbing murderous attacks in the heart of their cities.'"
By comparison, this is what Netanyahu was quoted as saying of America immediately following 9-11: "It's very good.Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)." The latter quote can be found as reference cite No. 57 here.